p. 1−15
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
1.0 and Phen/Anth ranges from 1.19 to 2.03 (< 10) which denote contamination sources, implying that the hydrocarbon sources are not just petrogenic but rather may due to contamination sources of combustion processes or the area was exposed to bush burning.]]>
p. 17−24
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
p. 25−41
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
p. 43−54
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
p. 55−72
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
p. 73−85
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
p. 87−100
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
p. 101−112
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
p. 113−127
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
p. 129−140
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
p. 141−152
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
p. 153−179
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
p. 181−196
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
p. 197−204
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
p. 205−216
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
p. 217−230
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
p. 231−240
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1
As> Cu> Co. Results from Igeo, Ef, and IPI show that As and Ni are placed in the very high pollution category. The non-carcinogenic risk of dermal absorption (adults = 1.30 E + 00, children = 1.35 E + 00) of Cr and Co polluted particles turn out to be very high. In addition, the risk of cancer as a result of the ingestion of As- and Cr-contaminated soil particles is high in both of age groups, with children being 68% more likely to be at risk of cancer than adults. Therefore, actions such as soil remediation should be done to reduce the risk of exposure and protect the health of the residents, especially the farmers.]]>
p. 241−256
2383-4501
Vol.7/No.1