Rapid Vulnerability Assessment of Lavizan Urban Forest Park

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Graduate Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, P.O.Box 14155-6135, Tehran, Iran

2 Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Although the vulnerability assessment of forest parks is used to determine the threats they face, a rapid and holistic framework has not been established well. The primary objective of this study is to adopt a framework for rapid assessment of forest parks vulnerability, examined in Lavizan forest park in Tehran (Iran) as the case study. The vulnerability assessment has been conducted, using the evaluation matrix on the basis of landscape and ecological values and threats. In this model, the most important values and threatening factors of the Lavizan forest park have been identified and assessed, based on the intensity of their effect as well as occurrence probability. Finally, this article proposes five strategies to reduce the vulnerability. Results from this research indicate that the most important values have been air purifcation, wildlife, flora and fauna species, environment regulation, mental health, and scientific resources and the most important threats have included reduction of habitat diversity, intensive exploitation of the resources, fire, woodcutting, and reduction of ecological connectivity. Based on these vulnerabilities, the most important strategies propose the use of affordance strategy formulation framework to preserve and enhance ecological and landscape values of the park.

Keywords

References

Allen, C. D., Breshears, D. D. and McDowell, N. G. (2015). On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die‐off from hotter drought in the Anthropocene. Ecosphere, 6(8), 1-55.
Amalina, P., Prasetyo, L. B. and Rushayati, S. B. (2016). Forest Fire Vulnerability Mapping in Way Kambas National Park. Procedia Environ Sci, 33, 239-252.
Babaian, F., Bagheri A. and Rafieian M. (2016 ). Water resource system vulnerability analysis relative to dehydration using the water accounting framework (case of Rafsenjan studied zone). Jorunal of Iran water resource research, 1(12), 1-17(In persian).
Baumgardner, D., Varela, S. Escobedo, F. J., Chacalo, A. and Ochoa, C. (2012). The role of a peri-urban forest on air quality improvement in the Mexico City megalopolis. Environ Pollut, 163, 174-183.
Berland, A. and Elliott, G. P. (2014). Unexpected connections between residential urban forest diversity and vulnerability to two invasive beetles. Landscape Ecol, 29(1), 141-152.
Bruner, A. G., Gullison, R. E., Rice, R. E. and Da Fonseca, G. A. (2001). Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science, 291(5501), 125-128.
Chiou, C.R., Lin, J.C., Liu, W.Y. and Lin, T.W. (2016). Assessing the recreational value of protective forests at Taitung Forest Park in Taiwan. Tourism Econ, 22(5), 1132-1140.
Darabi, H., and Saeedi I. (2013). Ecological Design of Urban Forest Park Case Study: Shahid Beshti Forest park in Brojerd. Journal of Environmental Studies, 39 (266), 1-10 .
Escobedo, F. J., Wagner, J. E., Nowak, D. J., De la Maza, C. L., Rodriguez, M. and Crane, D. E. (2008). Analyzing the cost effectiveness of Santiago, Chile's policy of using urban forests to improve air quality. J Environ Manag, 86(1), 148-157.
Fagerholm, N., Käyhkö, N., Ndumbaro, F. and Khamis, M. (2012). Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments–Mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecol Indic, 18, 421-433.
Flora, C. B. and Thiboumery, A. (2006). Community capitals: poverty reduction and rural development in dry areas. Ann Arid Zone, 45.
Flora C.B. and Flora J.L. (2004, March) Bonding and bridging social capital in communities with Latino.Paper presented at the  Annual Meeting of Cambio de Colores (Change of Colors): Latinos in Missouri: Gateway to a New Community. Missouri, USA
Franco, R. D. and Tarrega, M. C. V. B. (2015). A odisseia rumo a protecao do territorio Kalunga. In M. G. Almeida (Ed.), O territorio e a comunidade Kalunga: quilombolas em diversos olhares. Goiania: Editora UFG.
Fregetto, E. (2004). Immigrant and ethnic entrepreneurship: a US perspective. In H. P. Welsch (Ed.), Entrepreneurship: the way ahead. New York: Routledge.
Gulickx, M., Verburg, P., Stoorvogel, J., Kok, K. and Veldkamp, A. (2013). Mapping landscape services: a case study in a multifunctional rural landscape in The Netherlands. Ecol Indic, 24, 273-283.
Haaland, C. and van den Bosch, C. K. (2015). Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A review. Urban for Urban Gree, 14(4), 760-771.
Hartter, J., Solomon, J., Ryan, S. J, Jacobson, S. K. and Goldman, A. (2014). Contrasting perceptions of ecosystem services of an African forest park. Environ Conserv, 41(4), 330-340.
Holmes, T. P., Aukema, J. E., Von Holle, B., Liebhold, A. and Sills, E. (2009). Economic impacts of invasive species in forests. Ann Ny Acad Sci, 1162(1), 18-38.
Laćan, I. and McBride, J. R. (2008). Pest vulnerability matrix (PVM): a graphic model for assessing the interaction between tree species diversity and urban forest susceptibility to insects and diseases. Urban for Urban Gree, 7(4), 291-300.
Lee, S.C., Choi, S.H., Lee, W.K., Park, T.J., Oh, S.H. and Kim, S.N. (2011). Vulnerability assessment of forest distribution by the climate change scenarios. Journal of Korean Forest Society, 100(2), 256-265.
McPherson, E. G., Xiao, Q., van Doorn, N. S., de Goede, J., Bjorkman, J., Hollander, A, . . . Thorne, J. H. (2017). The structure, function and value of urban forests in California communities. Urban for Urban Gree, 28, 43-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.09.013.
Millward, A. A. and Sabir, S. (2010). Structure of a forested urban park: Implications for strategic management. J Environ Manag, 91(11), 2215-2224. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.006.
Millward, A. A. and Sabir, S. (2011). Benefits of a forested urban park: What is the value of Allan Gardens to the city of Toronto, Canada? Landscape and Urban Plan, 100(3), 177-188.
Moore, J. and Quine, C. P. (2000). A comparison of the relative risk of wind damage to planted forests in Border Forest Park, Great Britain, and the Central North Island, New Zealand. Forest Ecol Mang, 135(1), 345-353. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00292-9.
Morrison, J. L. and Chapman, W. C. (2005). Can urban parks provide habitat for woodpeckers? Northeast NAT, 12(3), 253-262.
Mullaney, J., Lucke, T. and Trueman, S. J. (2015). A review of benefits and challenges in growing street trees in paved urban environments. Landscape and Urban Plan, 134, 157-166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.013.
Nowak, D. J., Noble, M. H., Sisinni, S. M. and Dwyer, J. F. (2001). People and trees: assessing the US urban forest resource. J Forest, 99(3), 37-42.
Ordóñez, C. and Duinker, P. (2015). Climate change vulnerability assessment of the urban forest in three Canadian cities. Climatic Change, 131(4), 531-543.
Paracchini, M. L., Zulian, G., Kopperoinen, L., Maes, J., Schägner, J. P., Termansen, M, . . . Bidoglio, G. (2014). Mapping cultural ecosystem services: A framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU. Ecol Indic, 45(0), 371-385. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018.
Puric-Mladenovic, D., Bradley, D. and Strobl, S. (2012). Towards Improved Understanding of the Distribution and Abundabnce of Invasive Plant Species in Southern Ontario Forests. forests-settled-urban-landscapes.org.
Shochat, E., Lerman, S. B., Katti, M., and Lewis, D. B. (2004). Linking optimal foraging behavior to bird community structure in an urban-desert landscape: field experiments with artificial food patches. Am. Nat, 164(2), 232-243.
Steenberg, J. W., Millward, A. A., Nowak, D. J. and Robinson, P. J. (2016). A conceptual framework of urban forest ecosystem vulnerability. Environ Rev, 25(1), 115-126.
Steenberg, J. W., Millward, A. A., Nowak, D. J., Robinson, P. J. and Ellis, A., (2017). Forecasting urban forest ecosystem structure, function, and vulnerability. Environ Manage, 59(3), 373-392.
Stratford, C. J., Acreman, M. C., and Rees, H. G., (2011). A simple method for assessing the vulnerability of wetland ecosystem services. Hydrolog Sci J., 56(8), 1485-1500.
Tsunetsugu, Y., Lee, J., Park, B.J., Tyrväinen, L., Kagawa, T. and Miyazaki, Y. (2013). Physiological and psychological effects of viewing urban forest landscapes assessed by multiple measurements. Landscape Urban Plan, 113, 90-93.
Tyrväinen, L. (1997). The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37(3-4), 211-222.
Ungaro, F., Zasada, I. and Piorr, A. (2014). Mapping landscape services, spatial synergies and trade-offs. A case study using variogram models and geostatistical simulations in an agrarian landscape in North-East Germany. Ecol Indic, 46, 367-378.
Vallés-Planells, M., Galiana, F. and Van Eetvelde, V. (2014). A classification of landscape services to support local landscape planning. Ecol Soc, 19(1).
Ventura, A. d. O. B. and Lana, P. D. C. (2014). A new empirical index for assessing the vulnerability of peri-urban mangroves. J Environl Manag, 145, 289-298. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.04.036.
Wells, J.F. (2012). Complexity and sustainability (Vol. 26): Routledge.
Pollution
Volume 4, Issue 3
July 2018
Pages 417-428

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics